Skip to main content

The Bubble

I'm in it.

Let me explain. After the U.S elections in November, I deleted my Twitter account. Then I deleted my Facebook account. Finally, I deleted my Instagram account. Along the way I shuttered GoodReads in favor of StoryGraph, filtered out many unsavory news sources from my Google News feed, and blocked any account that even hinted at conservative/right-wing/MAGA apologist content on Bluesky (Bluesky makes it blessedly easy and fun to block accounts). I subscribed to Parker Malloy's newsletter and Wired too. I gave money to Matter News.

Liliane Lign sculptures, "Liquid Reflections/Series 2 (48")" (foreground) and "Liquid Reflections/Series 2 (40")" (background). Pictured at the Mumok Museum in Vienna.

In short, I've curated my online experience in such a way that I am subjected daily to near constant and unapologetic left-leaning viewpoints. Some would argue this is bad. They would say I'm in a bubble, a liberal echo chamber. Those people would contend that disengaging with people who hold different viewpoints than me is an abdication of my responsibility to engage and learn. How, they ask, can I do my part to bridge this great political divide in our country if I'm unwilling to even hear what the other side has to say?

As an intellectual exercise, that's a fair question. In terms of practical considerations though, it is wanting. That's because what it does not provide for is an exit strategy. That is, how long am I expected to listen, and to what end? What happens when all my earnest listening does nothing more than expose fundamental moral differences? What recourse do I have when I've heard enough to know that what I'm hearing is morally repugnant, self-serving, or some calamitous combination of both? Is there a point when I can rightly declare that I've heard all I need to? Where I'm allowed say, "You, fellow citizen with whom I disagree, are attempting to defend the indefensible. You are seeking to provide justification for that which cannot be justified."? Because frankly, I'm there.

By design, I have literally no idea how people in the MAGA-sphere are defending the actions of this current administration, and really, I don't care to know. That same ignorance holds firm in questions related to our own state's governance. At the end of the day, I do know this: with rare exception the arguments presented boil down to little more than a thin (and thinly veiled) gruel of hate, fear and avarice. 

So yeah, that bubble? I'm in it. Thankfully, it's a pretty big bubble full of a lot of big ideas; ideas like trans rights are human rights, no one is above the law, all persons should have bodily autonomy, black lives matter, science is real, vaccines are good, censorship is bad, no person is illegal, capitalism is a crime, prisons should be abolished, free Palestine, ride a bike, punch a Nazi, lift up the poor, embrace diversity, fight for equity, promote inclusion. And the list goes on...  

   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

#library30

  On Wednesday April 1, 2026 I'll be rebooting the #library30 photo challenge and inviting people to participate in this year's event. What is it? Even though I work in a library, it's not uncommon for me (and others in the field) to look to related cultural institutions for new ideas and new perspectives. That's how #library30 happened. My wife (who worked directly with museum professionals at the time), alerted me to the #museum30 initiative that had been launched by  Magnifying Zoology  in 2017. The premise was pretty simple. Participants worked from a set of daily prompts and posted pictures on social media related to the prompt along with the #museum30 hashtag. As I followed that hashtag and saw the amazing stories that were being shared, I thought, "Libraries should do that...". And #library30 was born. A plain text list of these prompts are provided at the end of this blog post.  How does it work? All you have to do is upload a photo related to the dail...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Ohio Historical Center: A Defense

A couple weeks ago I was contacted by Carrie Ghose at Business First to share my thoughts on architecture in central Ohio. The recent controversy surrounding the new Student Union at Ohio State had apparently sparked a number of conversations regarding what constitutes "good" building design. Carrie was following that story , and developing a second piece to get feedback on other notable Columbus buildings. At the time I offered a staunch a defense of what I believe might be the most maligned and misunderstood building in central Ohio, the Ohio Historical Center. Business First wasn't able to run the whole piece, so I've decided to turn it into a blog post. photo courtesy of OHS/ www.ohiomemory.org The refrain is a as old as the building itself, "It's ugly. It's just a giant brown box. It doesn't even look like a museum". Sadly, it's that exact line of thinking that poses the greatest threat to the building Architectural Record referre...
7 comments
Read more

Renovation Vacation

Back in August my wife and I decided to each take a week off from our respective works and embark on a "Renovation Vacation" at the Akron almost-mansion. The impetus behind the trip was two-fold. One consideration was our realization that it's really hard to make any kind of concerted progress when you live two hours from a job site. By the time we get everything packed for a typical trip, drive to the house, get our work area organized and start working, it's just about time to head back home. The other consideration was that with all the delays we've seen with this house, we thought it would be good for morale if we could make even some small progress on our own. The plan then was to spend a week "camping out" at the house and doing light projects and cleaning while we were there. I say camping out since it's kind of what it was like. Yes, the house has electric and 70% plumbing (including two functional toilets), but there's no heat, no kitche...
2 comments
Read more